ADHESIONS Messages for October, 2002: Re: THE CASE FOR MORPHINE: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRESCRIBE THEM?

Re: THE CASE FOR MORPHINE: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRESCRIBE THEM?

From: Marilyn Vaughan (mavaughan@iastate.edu)
Thu Oct 3 14:16:45 2002

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sugarbear110263@aol.com: "Re: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRES..."
Previous message: Helen Dynda: "THE CASE FOR MORPHINE: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRESCRIBE THEM?"

Hi, Helen. Time took this article off its site. To read more than the first paragraph, you now have to purchase it for $2.95. Just thought you'd want to know. Marilyn

At Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Helen Dynda wrote: >
>X> THE CASE FOR MORPHINE: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRESCRIBE THEM? (APRIL 1997)
>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/dom/970428/medicine.the_case_for. tml
>
>If the above Url does not appear correctly, you will have to enter the Url on the Address-line of your computer.
>
>Be sure the last part of this Url is..... for.html

Next message: Sugarbear110263@aol.com: "Re: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRES..."
Previous message: Helen Dynda: "THE CASE FOR MORPHINE: IF NOTHING IS BETTER FOR PAIN THAN NARCOTICS, WHY DON'T MORE DOCTORS PRESCRIBE THEM?"