Re: I'm New

From: Ann (anonymous@medispecialty.com)
Sun Feb 17 14:28:47 2002


Kel I think I had to have Chemo because it had gone too far - it took about 18 months to diagnose me and I was told my whole womb was enveloped in the tumours. At the time the C word was never used - I was told hydatidiform mole or just growths. I should probably have added that I am in England. I know that a lot of people who have had a molar pregnancy can go on and have children afterwards and be perfectly well, I was just unlucky. Ann At Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Kelly Murray wrote: >
>Ann,
>I am comfused on something. I also had a molar
>pregnancy but never had any kind of treatment except taking it out. You ere
>treated with Chemo for it?
>I also had ovarian cysts. I was a DES baby (hormonmes they used to give
>women that later they found out caused a lot of problems) I have had a l t
>of female problems.
>Gosh, was I supposed to be treated for the Molar Pregnancy? Mine was 15
>years ago.
>Kel
>

Enter keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords: